EECERA
(European Early Childhood Education Research Association) is the name of the
website that I subscribed to. The
purpose of EECERA is to increase the development of theoretical foundation of
the theme and related topics, the development of new research methodology, an
up to date overview of current knowledge and developments in the field
(EECERA.org). I am most interested in the
theme and related topics because it keeps me up to date on the latest trends
and issues. I am always concerned on
what's new around, as well I should be.
As an educator, I plan to teach my students according to the latest
theme and related topics.
Throughout
the article there were three controversial questions that stuck out to me. The questions are as follows: 1.) Should early childhood education programmers
be universally accessible and affordable to all? 2.)
Should resource programmers be targeted only at supporting those who are
in the greatest need? 3.) Is the quality factor in early childhood
education a universal concept or should it be individualized to context, and
adapted to accommodate different social and cultural constructs of
childhood. All three of these
questions are very controversial because no matter who you ask the question to,
you are guaranteed to get a different answer from.
If you ask a
politician questions such as, should all programs be affordable and should
resources only be provided to those in need, the answer is going to be the
obvious. A politician is usually running
for some sort of office and the need people to vote. Therefore, a good politician needs to seem
concerned. The answers would be very
similar to the following: every child
deserves a quality education and the resources should definitely be affordable
to them. Although this statement sounds
good coming from them, it is not always the case when they make it into the
office. Asking a neuroscientist who
needs resources to obtain a higher knowledge should be answered in one
way. But, unfortunately this can arise new
thoughts within certain people. Some
people feel like why should resources be provided to schools who already have
sufficient resources? Why not provide
low income schools with more resources?
Personally, I feel like what can be recycled should be. But, every school deserves new materials
every school year. Furthermore,
economists perceive some things to be universally accessible. I agree some things can be considered
universal, but several things are not considered universal. The most important aspect to remember is that are children are not universal, and
never will be. This is why the phrase,
"no child left behind" comes into effect. Because the system does not want any child to
fall through the cracks, the policy council and other educational
administration perform all tasks to ensure that all children can learn. Every child is important.
From this
website, I have learned to be more open minded.
There are some issues and trends that are going to be controversial,
however educators always consider what is in the best interest of the
child. Every educator, no matter where
they work, is an advocate or a voice for the children. Advocates can be politicians, neuroscientists
or economists. The qualifications of an
advocate is simply to want what's best for the child. I have learned this week to consider all
options and make them available resources when possible.
Reference
EECERA.org