Recently, I
discovered a real life case study on this website http://www.mcri.edu.au/media/62295/cases_q___c.pdf.
The title of the article is called "Opt-out consent and the role of
parental consent in a study in a child care centre." It is considered case number four in the
article. The experiment was designed to
study the spread of germs within the center.
Researchers spread DNA fragments of a plant virus on the surface of the
toys, doorknobs and other surfaces within the classroom. The purpose was to indicate where exactly the
spread of germs would be found in the classroom. Although, the researchers did consider the
health risks, they originally found none that was anticipated.
Later on,
there arrived a parent whose complaint led to one of the centers closing
down. The parent said there consent for
the experiment was never provided, because they were unaware of the research
experiment. A letter did go home with
each child in their belongs. Written on
the letter were the details of the experiment and everything that the parents
needed to know about the experiment. However,
the problem occurred simply because, anyone who has ever worked in child care
or anyone who has children knows that the parents do not check their child's
bag daily. Although, the parent claims
to have never received the letter, it was in the child's bag and they just did
not know to check. Whose fault is
that?
Therefore,
when the researchers approached the parents to gain consent for the final
portion of the experiment, which is the permission to swab the child's hands to
see if the solution was present , the parent became uncooperative. and said they were never aware of the experiment
was even taking place. Due to this
circumstance all parents were provided the opportunity to opt-out of the
experiment and not complete it to the end.
Surprisingly, none of them choose these option.
Here are
some pointers to ponder for researchers in the future:
Did the researchers in this experiment try hard enough to
gain parental consent?
Was the consent of the child needed in this experiment as
well?
Was the opt-out option an acceptable solution for this
matter?
What would have been the circumstances if the child would
have put the solution into their mouth and became sick?
Was the research experiment worth it in the end?
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks!